Learn About Diamonds Shopping Cart Order Status DIAMONDS ENGAGEMENT RINGS WEDDING RINGS DIAMOND JEWELRY LEARNING CENTER Round Princess Asscher Emerald Oval Marquise Pear Heart Shop by Product DIAMONDS Diamond Search Diamond 4 C’s ENGAGEMENT RINGS Solitaire Rings Rings with Sidestones Three Stone Rings Matching Bridal Sets Tension Rings DESIGNER RINGS Sareen Collection Tulip Collection MEN’S WEDDING RINGS Plain Wedding Rings Diamond Rings LADIES WEDDING RINGS Plain Wedding Rings Diamond Rings DIAMOND Wholesale jewelry JEWELRY Diamond Studs Diamond Earrings Diamond Bracelets Diamond Pendants
Jewelry Resources JEWELRY LEARNING CENTER Diamond Guide Engagement Ring Guide RESOURCES ARTICLES Diamonds Engagement Rings Wedding Rings Diamond Rings Diamond Jewelry Jewelry Sites
Special Offers and Promotions…details Stunning engagement ring settings and
certified diamonds with fire. Start with:
The Perfect Diamond | The Perfect Setting End Theme - Browse our stunning Stainless Steel jewelry collection of engagement ring settings and match it with a diamond from our fine selection of certified diamonds.
Start with: The Perfect Diamond The Perfect
Setting Certified Diamonds - Engagement Rings - Diamond Jewelry
Browse our collection of stunning diamond engagement ring settings. Sidestones in a diamond ring will perfectly compliment the brilliant center diamond. Browse our large selection of spectacular certified loose diamonds. Perfect Complete Diamond Engagement Rings
Your choice is easy! We matched our most popular Sterling Silver Jewelry ring settings with beautiful certified diamonds to creat Perfect and Complete Diamond Engagement Rings for any budget.
less than $900 $1800 - $2700 $900 - $1800 $2700 or more Unique ring styles and exceptional quality at an affordable price. View our exclusive designer engagement rings collections. Sareen Ring Collection Tulip Ring Collection Our mens wedding bands are
all hand made. Browse our selection of hammered metal, braided rope, and comfort-fit mens bands. All wedding bands are handcrafted in platinum or gold. Choose from our classic or contemporary designs. Superb quality. Unique style. Genuine tension set rings by Novori.
At Novori you can shop with confidence knowing that each diamond engagement ring is hand crafted using the highest quality diamonds with the finest precious metals. Novori engagement rings stand out for their beauty and quality with a truly affordable price. And if that’s not enough, at Novori your satisfaction is always guaranteed with any diamond ring purchase. We specialize in loose diamonds and diamond engagement rings and would like to help you find your perfect ring.
Satisfaction Guaranteed Customer Testimonials Our Return Policy Warranty Why Choose Novori? Free FedEx shipping to the USA No risk 30 day money back guarantee All engagement rings are made in the USA Registered with the Better Business Bureau Huge selection of high quality diamonds More Reasons
Customer Testimonials Thanks you once again for your valuable advice, patience and creative jewelry expertise. My wife?s ring design caused considerably more ooo?s, ah?s and wow?s than we ever expected. At a time of many sensitive…
Douglas
The number of rings with m elements, for m a natual number, is listed under A027623 in the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.
Properties of this ring
[edit] Integral domains and fields
Main articles: Integral domain and field
The requirement that a ring be a principal ideal domain is somewhat stronger than the other more common properties a ring may satisfy. For example, it is true that if a ring, R, is a unique factorization domain (UFD), then the polynomial ring over R is also a UFD. However, such a result does not in general hold for principal ideal rings. For example, the integers are an easy example of a principal ideal ring, but the polynomial ring over the integers fails to be a PIR; if R = Z[x] denotes the polynomial ring over the integers, I = 2 · R + X · R is an ideal which cannot be generated by a single element. Despite this counterexample, the polynomial ring over any field is always a principal ideal domain and in fact, a Euclidean domain. More generally, a polynomial ring is a PID if and only if the polynomial ring in question is over a field.
0 × 0 = 0
Let (A, +) be an abelian group and let End(A) be its endomorphism ring (see above). Note that, essentially, End(A) is the set of all morphisms of A, where if f is in End(A), and g is in End(A), the following rules may be used to compute f + g and f · g:
Similarly, Z4 is closed under multiplication as the right-most table shows (any result above is either 0, 1, 2 or 3). Associativity of multiplication in Z4 follows from associativity of multiplication in the set of all integers. The multiplicative identity is 1 as can be verified by looking at the right-most table. Therefore, Z4 is a monoid under multiplication.
[edit] Ideal
Main article: Ideal (ring theory)
A homomorphism from a ring (R, +, ·) to a ring (S, ?, *) is a function f from R to S that commutes with the ring operations; namely, such that, for all a, b in R the following identities hold:
(a + I) + (b + I) = (a + b) + I and
(a + I)(b + I) = (ab) + I.
It is remarkable how many different kinds of mathematical objects can be fruitfully analyzed in terms of some associated ring. For instance:
In mathematics, a ring is an algebraic structure consisting of a set together with two binary operations (usually called addition and multiplication), where each operation combines two elements to form a third element.
(I, +) is a subgroup of the underlying additive group in (R, +, · ) (i.e (I, +) is a subgroup of (R, +)). For every x in I and r in R, r · x is in I.
Notes
Formal definition
For example, a subring of the complex number ring C is any subset of C that includes 1 and is closed under addition, multiplication, and negation, such as:
While these operations are familiar from many mathematical structures, such as number systems or the integers, for example, they are also very general in the sense that they take a broad variety of mathematical objects into account. This allows one to handle entities of very different mathematical origins in a flexible way, while retaining essential structural aspects of many objects in abstract algebra and beyond. The ubiquity of rings makes them a central organizing principle of contemporary mathematics. The branch of mathematics that studies rings is known as ring theory.[1]
The theory of unique factorization domains (UFD) also forms an important part of ring theory. In effect, a unique factorization domain is ring in which an analogue of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic holds. Formally,
(f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x) (f · g)(x) = f(g(x))
Contents 1 Definition and illustration 1.1 First example: the integers
1.2 Formal definition
1.3 Notes on the definition
1.4 Second example: the ring Z4
1.5 Third example: the trivial ring 2 Basic concepts 2.1 Subring
2.2 Homomorphism
2.3 Ideal 3 History
4 Elementary properties of rings
5 New rings from old 5.1 Quotient ring
5.2 Polynomial ring
5.3 Matrix ring 6 Some examples of the ubiquity of rings
7 Special rings and rings with additional structure 7.1 Finite ring
7.2 Associative algebras
7.3 Lie ring
7.4 Topological ring 8 Commutative rings 8.1 Principal ideal domains
8.2 Unique factorization domains
8.3 Integral domains and fields 8.3.1 Relation to other algebraic structures 9 Noncommutative rings
10 Category theoretical description
11 See also
12 Notes 12.1 Citations 13 References 13.1 General references
13.2 Special references
13.3 Historical references [edit] Definition and illustration
[edit] First example: the integers v ? d ? e Algebraic structures Magma Set S with binary operation + Semigroup Associativity of + Monoid Existence of identity element for + in S Group Existence of inverse elements for + in S Abelian group Commutativity of + Pseudo-ring Associative binary operation ·
Distributivity of · over + Ring Existence of identity element for · in S Commutative ring Commutativity of · Field Existence of inverse elements for · in S
0 + 0 = 0
[edit] Elementary properties of rings
[edit] Homomorphism
Given a natural number m, how many distinct rings (not necessarily with unity) have m elements? When m is prime there are only two rings of order m; the additive group of each being isomorphic to the cyclic group of order m. One is the zero ring and the other is the Galois field.
The rational numbers Q
The algebraic numbers A
The real numbers R
The most familiar example of a ring is the set of all integers, Z, consisting of the numbers
It is simple (but tedious) to verify that Z4 is a ring under these operations. First of all, one can use the left-most table to show that Z4 is closed under addition (any result is either 0, 1, 2 or 3). Associativity of addition in Z4 follows from associativity of addition in the set of all integers. The additive identity is 0 as can be verified by looking at the left-most table. Given an integer x, there is always an inverse of x; this inverse is given by 4 - x as one can verify from the additive table. Therefore, Z4 is an abelian group under addition.
The ring Mr(R) can be viewed as merely the ring of r×r matrices over R with matrix addition and multiplication defined in the canonical manner. For given in Mr(R), f can be identified with the r×r matrix whose (i, j)-entry is fij. Therefore, in all that follows, Mr(R) and each of its elements shall be identified in this fashion. Addition and multiplication in Mr(R), and those of the underlying ring R, will be denoted by juxtaposition.
Let R be a ring. Then R is said to be a unique factorization domain (abbreviated UFD), if the following conditions are satisfied:
Informally, the quotient ring of a ring, is a generalization of the notion of a quotient group of a group. More formally, given a ring (R, +, · ) and a two-sided ideal I of (R, +, · ), the quotient ring (or factor ring) R/I is the set of cosets of I (with respect to the underlying additive group of (R, +, · ); i.e cosets with respect to (R, +)) together with the operations:
For arbitrary rings, one may define a prime element and an irreducible element; these two may not in general coincide. However, a prime element in a domain is always irreducible. For UFD’s, irreducible elements are also primes.
Examples
Formal definition
An important class of rings lying in between fields and PID’s, is the class of Euclidean domains. In particular, any field is a Euclidean domain, and any Euclidean domain is a PID. An ideal in a Euclidean domain is generated by any element of that ideal with minimum degree (all such elements must be associate). However, not every PID is a Euclidean domain; the ring furnishes a counterexample.
2. Every non-zero non-unit of R is the product of a finite number of irreducible elements.
Aside from the polynomial ring over a PIR, principal ideal rings possess many interesting properties due to their connection with the integers in terms of divisibility; that is, principal ideal domains behave similarly to the integers with respect to divisibility. For example, any PID is a UFD; i.e, an analogue of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic holds for principal ideal domains. Furthermore, since Noetherian rings are precisely those rings in which any ideal is finitely generated, principal ideal domains are trivially Noetherian rings. The fact that irreducible elements coincide with prime elements for PID’s, together with the fact that every PID is Noetherian, implies that any PID is a UFD. One can also speak of the greatest common divisor of two elements in a PID; if x and y are elements of R, a principal ideal domain, then x · R + y · R = c · R for some c in R since the left-hand side is indeed an ideal. Therefore, c is the desired “GCD” of x and y.
Another familiar example is the set of real numbers R, equipped with the usual addition and multiplication.
One of the best known noncommutative rings is the division ring of quaternions.
(R, +, · ) is required to be an abelian group under addition: 1.
Closure under addition.
For all a, b in R, the result of the operation a + b is also in R.c[?] 2.
Associativity of addition.
For all a, b, c in R, the equation (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) holds. 3.
Existence of additive identity.
There exists an element 0 in R, such that for all elements a in R, the equation 0 + a = a + 0 = a holds. 4.
Existence of additive inverse.
For each a in R, there exists an element b in R such that a + b = b + a = 0 5.
Commutativity of addition.
For all a, b in R, the equation a + b = b + a holds. (R, +, · ) is required to be a monoid under multiplication: 1.
Closure under multiplication.
For all a, b in R, the result of the operation a · b is also in R.c[?] 2.
Associativity of multiplication.
For all a, b, c in R, the equation (a · b) · c = a · (b · c) holds. 3.
Existence of multiplicative identity.a[?]
There exists an element 1 in R, such that for all elements a in R, the equation 1 · a = a · 1 = a holds. The distributive laws: 1. For all a, b and c in R, the equation a · (b + c) = (a · b) + (a · c) holds. 2. For all a, b and c in R, the equation (a + b) · c = (a · c) + (b · c) holds.
The theory of finite rings is more complex than that of finite abelian groups, since any finite abelian group is the additive group of at least two nonisomorphic finite rings: the direct product of copies of , and the zero ring. On the other hand, the theory of finite rings is simpler than that of not necessarily abelian finite groups. For instance, the classification of finite simple groups was one of the major breakthroughs of twentieth century mathematics, its proof spanning thousands of journal pages. On the other hand, any finite simple ring is isomorphic to the ring of n by n matrices over a finite field of order q. This follows from two theorems of Joseph Wedderburn established in 1905 and 1907.
While rings are very important mathematical objects, there are a lot of restrictions involved in their theory. For instance, suppose we have a ring R and suppose a and b are in R. If a is non-zero and a · b = 0, then b need not necessarily be 0. In particular, if a · b = a · c with a non-zero b need not equal c. An example of this is the set of n x n matrices over R where a maybe such a non-zero matrix but may be singular. In this case, the result may not be true. However, we can impose additional conditions on the ring to ensure that this be true; namely make the ring into an integral domain (that is a non-trivial commutative ring with no zero divisors). But we still run into a problem; namely we can’t necessarily divide by non-zero elements. For example, the collection of all integers form an integral domain but we still can’t divide an integer a by another integer b. For example, 2 cannot divide 3 to obtain another element in this ring. However, this problem can readily be solved if we ensure that every element in the ring has a multiplicative inverse. A field is a ring in which the non-zero elements form an abelian group under multiplication. In particular, a field is an integral domain (and therefore has no zero divisors) along with an additional operation of ‘division’. Namely, if a and b are in a field F, then a/b is defined to be a · b?1 which is well defined.
Noncommutative rings serve as an active area of research due to their ubiquity in mathematics. For instance, the ring of n by n matrices over a field is noncommutative despite its natural occurrence in physics. More generally, endomorphism rings of abelian groups are rarely commutative.
To qualify as a ring the set, together with its two operations, must satisfy certain conditions—namely, the set must be 1. an abelian group (also called commutative group) under addition; and 2. a monoid (a group without the invertibility property is a monoid) under multiplication;a[?] 3. such that multiplication distributes over addition.
The set of all real numbers, R, with its natural ring structure and the standard topology forms a topological ring. The direct product of two topological rings is also a topological ring. [edit] Commutative rings
Main article: Commutative ring
For every a, b in R.
Let (R, +, · ) be a ring. Then (R, +, · ) is said to be an integral domain if (R, +, · ) is commutative and has no zero divisors. Furthermore, (R, +, · ) is said to be a field, if its non-zero elements form an abelian group under multiplication.
then one can verify that ({0}, +, ×) forms a ring known as the trivial ring. Since there can be only one result for any product or sum (0), this ring is both closed and associative for addition and multiplication, and furthermore satisfies the distributive law. The additive and multiplicative identities are both equal to 0. Similarly, the additive inverse of 0 is 0. The trivial ring is also a (rather trivial) example of a zero ring (see below).
If, r2 = r for every r, the ring is called a Boolean ring. More general conditions which guarantee commutativity of a ring are also known.[12]
[edit] Polynomial ring
Main article: Polynomial ring
[edit] Notes on the definition
Formal definition
Any additive subgroup of the integers is an ideal in the integers with its natural ring structure. There are no non-trivial ideals in R (the ring of all real numbers) (i.e, the only ideals in R are {0} and R itself). More generally, a field cannot contain any non-trivial ideals. From the previous example, every field must be a principal ideal ring. A subset, I, of a commutative ring (R, +, · ) is a left ideal if and only if it is a right ideal. So for simplicity’s sake, we refer to any ideal in a commutative ring as just an ideal. [edit] History
Main article: Ring theory#History A portrait of Richard Dedekind: the founder of ring theory.
…, ?4, ?3, ?2, ?1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, …[3]
Formal definition
(I, +) is a subgroup of the underlying additive group in (R, +, · ) (i.e (I, +) is a subgroup of (R, +)). For every x in I and r in R, x · r is in I.
Examples
for every a, b in S, a + b is in S;
for every a, b in S, a · b is in S;
for every a in S, the additive inverse ?a of a is in S; and
the multiplicative identity ‘1′ of R is in S.
The integers form a commutative ring under the natural operations of addition and multiplication. In fact, the integers form what is known as an integral domain (a commutative ring with no zero divisors).
A ring whose non-zero elements form an abelian group under multiplication (not just a commutative monoid), is called a field. So every field is an integral domain and every integral domain is a commutative ring. Furthermore, any finite integral domain is a field. [edit] Relation to other algebraic structures
Then (Mr(R), +M, ·M) is a ring referred to as the ring of r×r matrices over R.
Definition
In general, given any two integers, x and y, if x ? y = 0, then either x is 0 or y is 0. It is interesting to note that this does not hold for the ring (Z4, +, ?): 2 ? 2 = 0 although neither factor is 0. In general, a non-zero element a of a ring, (R, +, ?) is said to be a zero divisor in (R, +, ?), if there exists a non-zero element b of R such that a ? b = 0. So in this ring, the only zero divisor is 2 (note that 0 ? a = 0 for any a in a ring (R, +, ?) so 0 is not considered to be a zero divisor). A commutative ring which has no zero divisors is called an integral domain (see below). So Z, the ring of all integers (see above), is an integral domain (and therefore a ring), although Z4 (the above example) does not form an integral domain (but is still a ring). So in general, every integral domain is a ring but not every ring is an integral domain. [edit] Third example: the trivial ring
1. R is an integral domain.
If we define on the singleton set {0}:
The integers form a commutative ring under the natural operations of addition and multiplication. An example of a noncommutative ring is the ring of n × n matrices over a non-trivial field K, for n > 1. In particular, the ring of all 2 × 2 matrices over R (the set of all real numbers) do not form a commutative ring as the following computation shows: , which is not equal to [edit] Principal ideal domains
Main article: Principal ideal domain
If we require that the zero element (0) in a ring to have a multiplicative inverse, then the ring must be trivial.
As with finite groups, the complexity of the classification depends upon the complexity of the prime factorization of m. If m is the square of a prime, for instance, there are precisely eleven rings having order m. On the other hand, there can be only two groups having order m; both of which are abelian.
Notes
Rings share a fundamental kinship with number theory and linear algebra. The former is responsible for various analogues of number-theoretic theorems in ring theory—for instance, the fundamental theorem of arithmetic translates to a certain special class of rings known as unique factorization domains. The latter is responsible for the rich theory of algebras, including, but not restricted to, matrix rings. This theory of matrix rings, for example, is a striking consequence of the ways in which noncommutative ring theory may be used to understand fundamental physical laws underlying special relativity and symmetry phenomena in molecular chemistry.
Let ‘+S’ and ‘·S’ denote the operations ‘+’ and ‘·’, restricted to S×S. Then (S, +S, ·S) is a subring of (R, +, ·).[9] Since the restricted operations are completely determined by S and the original ones, the subring is often written simply as (S, +, ·).
Lie rings are used in the study of finite p-groups through the Lazard correspondence. The lower central factors of a p-group are finite abelian p-groups, so modules over Z/pZ. The direct sum of the lower central factors is given the structure of a Lie ring by defining the bracket to be the commutator of two coset representatives. The Lie ring structure is enriched with another module homomorphism, then pth power map, making the associated Lie ring a so-called restricted Lie ring.
For example, the function that maps each integer x to its remainder modulo 4 (a number in {0, 1, 2, 3}) is a homomorphism from the ring Z to the ring Z4.
Consider the set Z4 consisting of the numbers 0, 1, 2, 3 where addition and multiplication are defined as follows (note that for any integer x, x mod 4 is defined to be the remainder when x is divided by 4):
The concept of a ring first arose from attempts to prove Fermat’s last theorem, starting with Richard Dedekind in the 1880s. After contributions from other fields, mainly number theory, the ring notion was generalized and firmly established during the 1920s by Emmy Noether and Wolfgang Krull.[2] Modern ring theory—a very active mathematical discipline—studies rings in their own right. To explore rings, mathematicians have devised various notions to break rings into smaller, better-understandable pieces, such as ideals, quotient rings and simple rings. In addition to these abstract properties, ring theorists also make various distinctions between the theory of commutative rings and noncommutative rings—the former belonging to algebraic number theory and algebraic geometry. A particularly rich theory has been developed for a certain special class of commutative rings, known as fields, which lies within the realm of field theory. Likewise, the corresponding theory for noncommutative rings, that of noncommutative division rings, constitutes an active research interest for noncommutative ring theorists. Since the discovery of a mysterious connection between noncommutative ring theory and geometry during the 1980s by Alain Connes, noncommutative geometry has become a particularly active discipline in ring theory.
Every ring can be thought of as monoids in Ab, the category of abelian groups (thought of as a monoidal category under the tensor product). The monoid action of a ring R on a abelian group is simply an R-module. Essentially, an R-module is a generalization of the notion of a vector space - where rather than a vector space over a field, one has a “vector space over a ring”.
If k is in R, then k · R is a right ideal in R, and R · k is a left ideal in R. These ideals (for any k in R) are called the principal right and left ideals generated by k. If every ideal in a ring (R, +, · ) is a principal ideal in (R, +, · ), (R, +, · ) is said to be a principal ideal ring. An ideal in a ring, (R, +, · ), is said to be a two-sided ideal if it is both a left ideal and right ideal in (R, +, · ). It is preferred to call a two-sided ideal, simply an ideal. If I = {0} (where 0 is the additive identity of the ring (R, +, · )), then I is an ideal known as the trivial ideal. Similarly, R is also an ideal in (R, +, · ) called the unit ideal.
[edit] Citations ^ Herstein 1964,?§3, p. 83
^ a b c d [1]
^ a b Lang 2005,?App. 2, p. 360
^ Herstein 1975,?§2.1, p. 27
^ Herstein, I. N. Topics in Algebra, Wiley; 2 edition (June 20, 1975), ISBN 0-471-01090-1.
^ Joseph Gallian (2004). Contemporary Abstract Algebra. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 9780618514717.
^ Neal H. McCoy (1964). The Theory of Rings. The MacMillian Company. pp. 161. ISBN 978-1124045559.
^ Raymond Louis Wilder (1965). Introduction to Foundations of Mathematics. John Wiley and Sons. p. 176.
^ Lang 2005,?§II.1, p. 90
^ Cohn, Harvey (1980). Advanced Number Theory. New York: Dover Publications. pp. 49. ISBN 9780486640235.
^ Jacobson 1945
^ Pinter-Lucke 2007 [edit] References
[edit] General references R.B.J.T. Allenby (1991). Rings, Fields and Groups. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0-340-54440-6.
Atiyah M. F., Macdonald, I. G., Introduction to commutative algebra. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.-London-Don Mills, Ont. 1969 ix+128 pp.
Beachy, J. A. Introductory Lectures on Rings and Modules. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
T.S. Blyth and E.F. Robertson (1985). Groups, rings and fields: Algebra through practice, Book 3. Cambridge university Press. ISBN 0-521-27288-2.
Dresden, G. “Small Rings.” [2]
Ellis, G. Rings and Fields. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Goodearl, K. R., Warfield, R. B., Jr., An introduction to noncommutative Noetherian rings. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989. xviii+303 pp. ISBN 0-521-36086-2
Herstein, I. N., Noncommutative rings. Reprint of the 1968 original. With an afterword by Lance W. Small. Carus Mathematical Monographs, 15. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1994. xii+202 pp. ISBN 0-88385-015-X
Nagell, T. “Moduls, Rings, and Fields.” §6 in Introduction to Number Theory. New York: Wiley, pp. 19–21, 1951
Nathan Jacobson, Structure of rings. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Vol. 37. Revised edition American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I. 1964 ix+299 pp.
Nathan Jacobson, The Theory of Rings. American Mathematical Society Mathematical Surveys, vol. I. American Mathematical Society, New York, 1943. vi+150 pp.
Kaplansky, Irving (1974), Commutative rings (Revised ed.), University of Chicago Press, MR0345945
Lam, T. Y., A first course in noncommutative rings. Second edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 131. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. xx+385 pp. ISBN 0-387-95183-0
Lam, T. Y., Exercises in classical ring theory. Second edition. Problem Books in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003. xx+359 pp. ISBN 0-387-00500-5
Lam, T. Y., Lectures on modules and rings. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 189. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999. xxiv+557 pp. ISBN 0-387-98428-3
Lang, Serge (2002), Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 211 (Revised third ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag, MR1878556, ISBN 978-0-387-95385-4
Lang, Serge (2005), Undergraduate Algebra (3rd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-22025-3 .
Matsumura, Hideyuki (1989), Commutative Ring Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-36764-6
McConnell, J. C.; Robson, J. C. Noncommutative Noetherian rings. Revised edition. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 30. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001. xx+636 pp. ISBN 0-8218-2169-5
Pinter-Lucke, James (2007), “Commutativity conditions for rings: 1950–2005″, Expositiones Mathematicae 25 (2): 165–174, doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2006.07.001, ISSN 0723-0869
Rowen, Louis H., Ring theory. Vol. I, II. Pure and Applied Mathematics, 127, 128. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988. ISBN 0-12-599841-4, ISBN 0-12-599842-2
Sloane, N. J. A. Sequences A027623 and A037234 in “The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences
Zwillinger, D. (Ed.). “Rings.” §2.6.3 in CRC Standard Mathematical Tables and Formulae. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 141–143, 1995 [edit] Special references Balcerzyk, Stanis?aw; Józefiak, Tadeusz (1989), Commutative Noetherian and Krull rings, Ellis Horwood Series: Mathematics and its Applications, Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd., ISBN 978-0-13-155615-7 Balcerzyk, Stanis?aw; Józefiak, Tadeusz (1989), Dimension, multiplicity and homological methods, Ellis Horwood Series: Mathematics and its Applications., Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd., ISBN 978-0-13-155623-2
Ballieu, R. “Anneaux finis; systèmes hypercomplexes de rang trois sur un corps commutatif.” Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles. Sér. I 61, 222-227, 1947.
Berrick, A. J. and Keating, M. E. An Introduction to Rings and Modules with K-Theory in View. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Eisenbud, David (1995), Commutative algebra. With a view toward algebraic geometry., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 150, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, MR1322960, ISBN 978-0-387-94268-1; 978-0-387-94269-8
Fine, B. “Classification of Finite Rings of Order .” Math. Mag. 66, 248-252, 1993
Fletcher, C. R. “Rings of Small Order.” Math. Gaz. 64, 9-22, 1980
Fraenkel, A. “?ber die Teiler der Null und die Zerlegung von Ringen.” J. reine angew. Math. 145, 139-176, 1914
Gilmer, R. and Mott, J. “Associative Rings of Order .” Proc. Japan Acad. 49, 795-799, 1973
Harris, J. W. and Stocker, H. Handbook of Mathematics and Computational Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998
Jacobson, Nathan (1945), “Structure theory of algebraic algebras of bounded degree”, Annals of Mathematics 46 (4): 695–707, ISSN 0003-486X
Knuth, D. E. The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 2: Seminumerical Algorithms, 3rd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1998
Korn, G. A. and Korn, T. M. Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers. New York: Dover, 2000
Nagata, Masayoshi (1962), Local rings, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13, Interscience Publishers, pp. xiii+234, MR0155856, ISBN 978-0-88275-228-0 (1975 reprint)
Pierce, Richard S., Associative algebras. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 88. Studies in the History of Modern Science, 9. Springer-Verlag, New York–Berlin, 1982. xii+436 pp. ISBN 0-387-90693-2
Zariski, Oscar; Samuel, Pierre (1975), Commutative algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 28, 29, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag [edit] Historical references History of ring theory at the MacTutor Archive
Birkhoff, G. and Mac Lane, S. A Survey of Modern Algebra, 5th ed. New York: Macmillian, 1996
Bronshtein, I. N. and Semendyayev, K. A. Handbook of Mathematics, 4th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2004. ISBN 3-540-43491-7
Faith, Carl, Rings and things and a fine array of twentieth century associative algebra. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 65. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999. xxxiv+422 pp. ISBN 0-8218-0993-8
It?, K. (Ed.). “Rings.” §368 in Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, 2nd ed., Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986
Kleiner, I. “The Genesis of the Abstract Ring Concept.” Amer. Math. Monthly 103, 417-424, 1996
Renteln, P. and Dundes, A. “Foolproof: A Sampling of Mathematical Folk Humor.” Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 52, 24-34, 2005
Singmaster, D. and Bloom, D. M. “Problem E1648.” Amer. Math. Monthly 71, 918-920, 1964
Van der Waerden, B. L. A History of Algebra. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985
Wolfram, S. A New Kind of Science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media, p. 1168, 2002 Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_(mathematics)” Categories: Algebraic structures | Mathematical structures | Ring theory Views Article Discussion Edit this page History Personal tools Try Beta Log in / create account Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Search Interaction About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact Wikipedia Donate to Wikipedia Help Toolbox What links here Related changes
Upload file
Special pages Printable version Permanent linkCite this page Languages ??????? Bosanski Català Ч?вашла ?esky Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικ? Espa?ol Esperanto ????? Fran?ais ??? Hrvatski Italiano ????? Lumbaart Magyar Nederlands 日本語 ?Norsk (bokm?l)? ?Norsk (nynorsk)? Novial Piemontèis Polski Português Rom?n? Русский Simple English Sloven?ina Sloven??ina Српски / Srpski Suomi Svenska ????? ??? Türk?e Укра?нська Ti?ng Vi?t 文言 West-Vlams 吴语 中文 This page was last modified on 2 March 2010 at 20:23.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply.
See Terms of Use for details.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Contact us Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers
3. If = , where all ai’s and bj’s are irreducible, then n = m and after possible renumbering of the ai’s and bj’s, bi = ai · ui where ui is a unit in R.
The integers form an abelian group under addition; that is: Closure axiom for addition: Given two integers a and b, their sum, a + b is also an integer.
Existence of additive identity: For any integer a, a + 0 = 0 + a = a. Zero is called the identity element of the integers because adding 0 to any integer (in any order) returns the same integer.
Commutativity of addition: For any two integers a and b, a + b = b + a. So the order in which two integers are added is irrelevant.
Associativity of addition: For any integers, a, b and c, (a + b) + c = a + (b + c). So, adding b to a, and then adding c to this result, is the same as adding c to b, and then adding this result to a.
Existence of additive inverse: For any integer a, there exists an integer denoted by ?a such that a + (?a) = (?a) + a = 0. The element, ?a, is called the additive inverse of a because adding a to ?a (in any order) returns the identity. The integers form a multiplicative monoid (a monoid under multiplication); that is: Closure axiom for multiplication: Given two integers a and b, their product, a · b is also an integer.
Associativity of multiplication: Given any integers, a, b and c, (a · b) · c = a · (b · c). So multiplying b with a, and then multiplying c to this result, is the same as multiplying c with b, and then multiplying a to this result.
Existence of multiplicative identity: For any integer a, a · 1 = 1 · a = a. So multiplying any integer with 1 (in any order) gives back that integer. One is therefore called the multiplicative identity. Multiplication is distributive over addition : These two structures on the integers (addition and multiplication) are compatible in the sense that a · (b + c) = (a · b) + (a · c), and
(a + b) · c = (a · c) + (b · c) for any three integers a, b and c. [edit] Formal definition
For any element a, the equations a ? 0 = 0 ? a = 0 hold.
If 0 = 1, the ring is trivial (that is, R has only one element).
For any element a, the equation (?1) ? a = ?a holds.
For any elements a and b, the equations (?a) ? b = a ? (?b) = ?(a ? b) [edit] New rings from old
[edit] Quotient ring
Main article: Quotient ring
Noncommutative rings, like noncommutative groups, are not very well understood. For instance, although every finite abelian group is the direct sum of (finite) cyclic groups of prime-power order, non-abelian groups do not possess such a simple structure. Likewise, various invariants exist for commutative rings, whereas invariants of noncommutative rings are difficult to find. As an example, the nilradical, although “innocent” in nature, need not be an ideal unless the ring is assumed to be commutative. Specifically, the set of all nilpotent elements in the ring of all n x n matrices over a division ring never forms an ideal, irrespective of the division ring chosen. Therefore, the nilradical cannot be studied in noncommutative ring theory. Note however that there are analogues of the nilradical defined for noncommutative rings, that coincide with the nilradical when commutativity is assumed.
This definition assumes that a binary operation on R is a function defined on R×R with values in R. Therefore, for any a and b in R, the addition a + b and the product a · b are elements of R.
Some properties of rings follow directly from the ring axioms through very simple proofs.
[edit] Associative algebras
A ring is a set R equipped with two binary operations + : R × R → R and · : R × R → R (where × denotes the Cartesian product), called addition and multiplication. To qualify as a ring, the set and two operations, (R, +, · ), must satisfy the following requirements known as the ring axioms.[4]
Notes
where + as in f(x) + g(x) is addition in A, and function composition is denoted from right to left. Therefore, associated to any abelian group, is a ring. Conversely, given any ring, (R, +, · ), (R, +) is an abelian group. Furthermore, for every r in R, right (or left) multiplication by r gives rise to a morphism of (R, +), by right (or left) distributivity. Let A = (R, +). Consider those endomorphisms of A, that “factor through” right (or left) multiplication of R. In other words, let EndR(A) be the set of all morphisms m of A, having the property that m(r · x) = r · m(x). It was seen that every r in R gives rise to a morphism of A - right multiplication by r. It is in fact true that this association of any element of R, to a morphism of A, as a function from R to EndR(A), is an isomorphism of rings. In this sense, therefore, any ring can be viewed as the endomorphism ring of some abelian X-group (by X-group, it is meant a group with X being its set of operators). In essence, the most general form of a ring, is the endomorphism group of some abelian X-group.
Another example of ring is the set of all square matrices of a fixed size, with real elements, using the matrix addition and multiplication of linear algebra. In this case, the ring elements 0 and 1 are the zero matrix (with all entries equal to 0) and the identity matrix, respectively.
Richard Dedekind (image to the right) introduced the concept of a ring,[2] and the term ring (Zahlring) was coined by David Hilbert in 1892 and published in the article Die Theorie der algebraischen Zahlk?rper, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker Vereinigung, Vol. 4, 1897. According to Harvey Cohn, Hilbert used the term for a specific ring that had the property of “circling directly back” to an element of itself.[10]
Fields and integral domains are very important in modern algebra.
[edit] See also Wikibooks has a book on the topic of
Abstract algebra/Rings, fields and modules Ring theory
Glossary of ring theory
Category of rings
Algebra over a commutative ring
Nonassociative ring
Algebraic structure
Chinese remainder theorem
Semiring Special types of rings: Boolean ring
Commutative ring
Ordered ring
Noetherian and artinian rings
Dedekind ring
Differential ring
Division ring (skew field)
Exponential ring
Field
Integral domain (ID)
Local ring
Principal ideal domain (PID)
Reduced ring
Regular ring
Unique factorization domain (UFD)
Valuation ring and discrete valuation ring
Zero ring [edit] Notes
For any x, y in Z4, x + y is defined to be their sum in Z (the set of all integers) mod 4. So we can represent the additive structure of Z4 by the left-most table as shown. For any x, y in Z4, x ? y is defined to be their product in Z (the set of all integers) mod 4. So we can represent the multiplicative structure of Z4 by the right-most table as shown. ·
0
1
2
3 0
0
0
0
0 1
0
1
2
3 2
0
2
0
2 3
0
3
2
1 +
0
1
2
3 0
0
1
2
3 1
1
2
3
0 2
2
3
0
1 3
3
0
1
2
The most familiar example of a ring is the set of all integers, Z = {…, ?4, ?3, ?2, ?1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, … }, together with the usual operations of addition and multiplication.[3]
The class of unique factorization domains is related to other classes of rings. For instance, any Noetherian domain satisfies conditions 1 and 2 above, but in general Noetherian domains fail to satisfy condition 3. However, if the set of prime elements and the set of irreducible elements coincide for a Noetherian domain, the third condition of a UFD is satisfied. In particular, principal ideal domains are UFD’s.
[edit] Noncommutative rings
Main article: Ring theory
Although ring addition is commutative, so that for every a, b in R, a + b = b + a, ring multiplication is not required to be commutative; a · b need not equal b · a for all a, b in R. Rings that also satisfy commutativity for multiplication are called commutative rings.e[?] Formally,
together with the usual operations of addition and multiplication. These operations satisfy the following properties:
A more significant disagreement is that some authors omit the existence of a multiplicative identity in a ring[5][6] [7] . For instance, this would allow the even integers to form a ring with the natural operations of addition and multiplication (all ring axioms are satisfied except for the existence of a multiplicative identity). Rings that satisfy the ring axioms as given above but do not contain a multiplicative identity are sometimes called pseudo-rings. The term rng (jocular; ring without the multiplicative identity) is also used for such rings. Rings which do have multiplicative identities (and also satisfy the above axioms) are sometimes referred to unital rings, unitary rings, rings with unity, rings with identity or rings with 1.[8] Note that one can always embed a non-unitary ring inside a unitary ring (see this for one particular construction of this embedding).
This allows one to view S as merely the set of all polynomials over R in the variable X, with multiplication and addition of polynomials defined in the canonical manner. Therefore, in all that follows, S, denoted by R[X], shall be identified in this fashion. Addition and multiplication in S, and those of the underlying ring R, will be denoted by juxtaposition.
Let (R, +R, ·R) be a ring and let . Define +M : Mr(R) × Mr(R) → Mr(R) and ·M : Mr(R) × Mr(R) → Mr(R), as follows (where and are arbitrary elements of Mr(R)):
[edit] Topological ring
[edit] Lie ring
The theory of vector spaces is one illustration of a special case of an object studied in noncommutative ring theory. In linear algebra, the “scalars of a vector space” are required to lie in a field - a commutative division ring. The concept of a module, however, requires only that the scalars lie in an abstract ring. Neither commutativity nor the division ring assumption is required on the scalars in this case. Module theory has various applications in noncommutative ring theory, as one can often obtain information about the structure of a ring by making use of its modules. The concept of the Jacobson radical of a ring; that is, the intersection of all right/left annihilators of simple right/left modules over a ring, is one example. The fact that the Jacobson radical can be viewed as the intersection of all maximal right/left ideals in the ring, shows how the internal structure of the ring is reflected by its modules. It is also remarkable that the intersection of all maximal right ideals in a ring is the same as the intersection of all maximal left ideals in the ring, in the context of all rings; whether commutative or noncommutative. Therefore, the Jacobson radical also captures a concept which may seem to be not well-defined for noncommutative rings.
The study of rings originated from the theory of polynomial rings and the theory of algebraic integers. Furthermore, the appearance of hypercomplex numbers in the mid-nineteenth century undercut the pre-eminence of fields in mathematical analysis.
A ring homomorphism is said to be an isomorphism if it is both an epimorphism and a monomorphism in the category of rings.
Moreover, the function f must take the identity element 1R of ‘·’ to the identity element 1S of ‘*’.
Definition
Then (S, +S, ·S) is a ring referred to as the polynomial ring over R.
The study of noncommutative rings is a major area in modern algebra; especially ring theory. Often noncommutative rings possess interesting invariants that commutative rings do not. As an example, there exist rings which contain non-trivial proper left or right ideals, but are still simple; that is contain no non-trivial proper (two-sided) ideals. This example illustrates how one must take care when studying noncommutative rings because of possible counterintuitive misconceptions.
If f is a ring homomorphism from (R, +, ·) to (S, ?, *), the inverse image of the identity element 1S of ? (that is, all elements of R that are mapped to 1S by f) is a subring of (R, +, ·).
One of these theorems, known as Wedderburn’s little theorem, asserts that any finite division ring is necessarily commutative. Nathan Jacobson later discovered yet another condition which guarantees commutativity of a ring:
Examples
Commutative rings ? integral domains ? half factorization domains ?unique factorization domains ? principal ideal domains ? Euclidean domains ? fields
A left ideal is similarly defined with the second condition being replaced. More specifically, a subset I of R is a left ideal in R if:
To any topological space X one can associate its integral cohomology ring , a graded ring. As the name suggests, there are also homology groups of a space, and indeed these were defined first, as a useful tool for distinguishing between certain pairs of topological spaces, like the spheres and tori, for which the methods of point-set topology are not well-suited. Cohomology groups were later defined in terms of homology groups in a way which is roughly analogous to the dual of a vector space. To know each individual integral homology group is essentially the same as knowing each individual integral cohomology group, because of the universal coefficient theorem. However, the advantage of the cohomology groups is that there is a natural product, which is analogous to the observation that one can multiply pointwise a k-multilinear form and an l-multilinear form to get a (k + l)-mulilinear form. The importance of the ring structure in cohomology is hard to overstate: it provides the foundation for characteristic classes of fiber bundles, intersection theory on manifolds and algebraic varieties, Schubert calculus and much more.
To any group is associated its Burnside ring which uses a ring to describe the various ways the group can act on a finite set. The Burnside ring’s additive group is the free abelian group whose basis are the transitive actions of the group and whose addition is the disjoint union of the action. Expressing an action in terms of the basis is decomposing an action into its transitive constituents. The multiplication is easily expressed in terms of the representation ring: the multiplication in the Burnside ring is formed by writing the tensor product of two permutation modules as a permutation module. The ring structure allows a formal way of subtracting one action from another. Since the Burnside ring is contained as a finite index subring of the representation ring, one can pass easily from one to the other by extending the coefficients from integers to the rational numbers.
To any group ring or Hopf algebra is associated its representation ring or “Green ring”. The representation ring’s additive group is the free abelian group whose basis are the indecomposable modules and whose addition corresponds to the direct sum. Expressing a module in terms of the basis is finding an indecomposable decomposition of the module. The multiplication is the tensor product. When the algebra is semisimple, the representation ring is just the character ring from character theory, which is more or less the Grothendieck group given a ring structure.
To any irreducible algebraic variety is associated its function field. The points of an algebraic variety correspond to valuation rings contained in the function field and containing the coordinate ring. The study of algebraic geometry makes heavy use of commutative algebra to study geometric concepts in terms of ring-theoretic properties. Birational geometry studies maps between the subrings of the function field.
Every simplicial complex has an associated face ring, also called its Stanley–Reisner ring. This ring reflects many of the combinatorial properties of the simplicial complex, so it is of particular interest in algebraic combinatorics. In particular, the algebraic geometry of the Stanley–Reisner ring was used to characterize the numbers of faces in each dimension of simplicial polytopes. [edit] Special rings and rings with additional structure
[edit] Finite ring
Main article: Finite ring
If A is a subring of R, and B is a subset of A such that B is also a subring of R, then B is a subring of A.
However, rings also have specific properties that combine addition with multiplication. In any ring (R, +, ?):
[edit] Second example: the ring Z4
The second condition above guarantees that “non-trivial” elements of R can be decomposed into irreducibles, and according to the third condition, such a finite decomposition is unique “up to multiplication by unit elements.” This weakened form of uniqueness is reasonable to assume for otherwise even the integers would not satisfy the properties of being a UFD ((-2)2 = 22 = 4 demonstrates two “distint” decompositions of 4; however both decompositions of 4 are equivalent up to multiplication by units (-1 and +1)). The fact that the integers constitute a UFD follows from the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.
[edit] Category theoretical description
Note
If for every element r of R there exists an integer n > 1 such that rn = r, then R is commutative.[11]
Bilinearity: for all x, y, z ∈ L. Jacobi identity: for all x, y, z in L. For all x in L.
Lie rings need not be Lie groups under addition. Any Lie algebra is an example of a Lie ring. Any associative ring can be made into a Lie ring by defining a bracket operator [x,y] = xy ? yx. Conversely to any Lie algebra there is a corresponding ring, called the universal enveloping algebra.
[edit] Basic concepts
[edit] Subring
There are still other more significant differences between two particular definitions of a ring. For instance, some authors omit associativity of multiplication in the set of ring axioms; rings that are nonassociative are called nonassociative rings. In this article, all rings are assumed to satisfy the axioms as given above unless stated otherwise.
Therefore, this set does indeed form a ring under the given operations of addition and multiplication.
In particular, since the axioms state that (R,+) is a commutative group, all pertinent theorems of group theory apply, such as the uniqueness of the additive identity and the uniqueness of the additive inverse of a particular element. In the same way one can prove the uniqueness of the inverse of a unit in a ring.
A Lie ring is defined to be a ring that is nonassociative and anticommutative under multiplication, that also satisfies the Jacobi identity. More specifically we can define a Lie ring L to be an abelian group under addition with an operation that has the following properties:
Examples
Let (R, +, · ) be a ring. Then (R, +, · ) is said to be a commutative ring if for every a, b in R, a · b = b · a. That is, (R, +, · ) is required to be a commutative monoid under multiplication.
Lie rings are also useful in the definition of a p-adic analytic groups and their endomorphisms by studying Lie algebras over rings of integers such as the p-adic integers. The definition of finite groups of Lie type due to Chevalley involves restricting from a Lie algebra over the complex numbers to a Lie algebra over the integers, and the reducing modulo p to get a Lie algebra over a finite field.
[edit] Unique factorization domains
Main article: Unique factorization domain
The first axiomatic definition of a ring was given by Adolf Fraenkel in an essay in Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (A. L. Crelle), vol. 145, 1914.[2] In 1921, Emmy Noether gave the first axiomatic foundation of the theory of commutative rings in her monumental paper Ideal Theory in Rings.[2]
The following is a chain of class inclusions that describes the relationship between rings, domains and fields:
f(a + b) = f(a) ? f(b) f(a · b) = f(a) * f(b)
Most authors write S as R[X], where is an element of S. This convention is adopted because if is an element of S, and if , f can be written as a polynomial with coefficients in R, in the variable X, as follows:
Informally, a subring of a ring is another ring that uses the “same” operations and is contained in it. More formally, suppose (R, +, ·) is a ring, and S is a subset of R such that
The purpose of an ideal in a ring is to somehow allow one to define the quotient ring of a ring (analogous to the quotient group of a group; see below). An ideal in a ring can therefore be thought of as a generalization of a normal subgroup in a group. More formally, let (R, +, · ) be a ring. A subset I of R is said to be a right ideal in R if:
^ a: Some authors only require that a ring be a semigroup under multiplication; that is, do not require that there be a multiplicative identity (1). See the section Notes on the definition for more details.
^ b: Elements which do have multiplicative inverses are called units, see Lang 2002,?§II.1, p. 84 or this for a treatment of units in this article.
^ c: The closure axiom is already implied by the condition that +/? be a binary operation. Some authors therefore omit this axiom. Lang 2002
^ d: The transition from the integers to the rationals by adding fractions is generalized by the quotient field.
^ e: Many authors include commutativity of rings in the set of ring axioms (see above) and therefore refer to “commutative rings” as just “rings”.
[edit] Matrix ring
Main article: Matrix ring
Ring (mathematics) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about algebraic structures. For geometric rings, see Annulus (mathematics). For the set theory concept, see Ring of sets. An image illustrating geometric addition on a cubic curve in projective space. Ring theory has many important applications in algebraic geometry.
There are some differences in exactly what axioms are used to define a ring. Here one set of axioms is given, and comments on variations follow.
Let (R, +R, ·R) be a ring and let where the convention that is the set of all nonnegative integers, is adopted. Define +S : S × S → S and ·S : S × S → S, as follows (where and are arbitrary elements of S):
Although rings are structurally similar to the integers, there are certain ring-theoretic properties that the integers may satisfy but a general ring may not. One such property is the requirement that every ideal in a ring be generated by a single element; that is, be a principal ideal. Formally,
Let R be a ring. Then R is said to be a principal ideal ring (abbreviated PIR), if every ideal in R is of the form a · R = {a · r | r · R}. A principal ideal domain is a principal ideal ring that is also an integral domain.
[edit] Some examples of the ubiquity of rings
As with some axiomatic theories, there are often differences of usage in what axioms a ring should satisfy. Sometimes the disagreement between two definitions is minor. For instance, some authors insist that 1 ≠ 0 in a ring (in words, this means that the multiplicative identity of the ring must be different from its additive identity). In particular they do not consider the trivial ring to be a ring (see below).
An associative algebra is a ring that is also a vector space over a field K. For instance, the set of n by n matrices over the real field R has dimension n2 as a real vector space, and the matrix multiplication corresponds to the ring multiplication. For a non-trivial but elementary example consider 2 × 2 real matrices.
Distributivity of the two operations over each other follow from distributivity of addition over multiplication (and vice-versa) in Z (the set of all integers).
Let (X, T) is a topological space and (X, +, · ) be a ring. Then (X, T, +, · ) is said to be a topological ring, if its ring structure and topological structure are both compatible (i.e work together) over each other. That is, the addition map ( ) and the multiplication map ( ) have to be both continuous as maps between topological spaces where X x X inherits the product topology. So clearly, any topological ring is a topological group (under addition).
Quick Search Advanced Search Shopping Cart You Have 0 items Log In | Cart Contents | Checkout Home Wedding Jewelry Pearl Necklaces Coral Jewelry Turquoise Jewelry New Products Product Reviews Contact Us Online Support Chat–> Live Support Online Support Chat Jewelry Categories Clear Stocks Shop by Occasion Jewelry sets Freshwater Pearl Jewelry Akoya Pearl Jewelry Mabe Pearl Jewelry Wedding & Bridal jewelry Swarovski & crystal jewelry 925 Sterling Silver Jewelry Thai Silver Jewelry Stainless Steel Jewelry Coral Jewelry Turquoise Jewelry Gemstone Jewelry Jewelry Gifts Fashion & Costume jewelry Jewel fittings & accessories Watches Jewelry Men’s jewelry Body Jewelry Jadeite & Jade jewelry Cloisonné enamel jewelry Pandora Beads & Jewelry Cinnabar Jewelry & Beads Wholesale Pearl Beads Wholesale beads & strands Specials
MER102 5pcs ring made with stainless steel, inlaid 10mm faceted square black agate bead
$22.08 $15.46 Featured Jewelry
HB2001 - 100pcs freshwater wish pearl wholesale
$170.00 Articles New Articles (0)
All Articles (1)
Bridal & wedding jewelry (1)
Pearl jewellery
Crystal jewelry
Sterling silver jewelry
Languages Hydia Pearl - Wholesale pearl jewelry Wholesale pearl jewelry” title=” Hydia Pearl - Wholesale pearl jewelry “> Welcome to wholesale jewelry. Log in or create account New Products For March LVF45 alloy rectangle watch face, quartz movement $1.64 - $1.93 KZW05 multi-size coin kunzite strand beads 15 inches $4.22 - $4.97 9SP243 triangle smoky quartz & white topaz 925 sterling silver pendant $42.23 - $49.68 BN16 alloy pattern leather hip hop purse $5.16 - $6.07 SPW307 gemstone pendant, 40*30mm rectangle blue dyed agate $1.88 - $2.21 9SP211 oval rose quartz with tourmaline 925 sterling silver pendant $98.52 - $115.90 BN29 alloy skull cross leather hip hop purse $6.57 - $7.73 14KGNC104 jewelry finding 14k gold 8mm round box clasp $24.00 ,wholesale jewelry; SPW337 gemstone pendant, 48*35mm horn purple dyed kunzite $1.64 - $1.93 CFJ22 15 inches mahogany round 6mm fossil coral beads $3.05 - $3.59 SPW304 gemstone pendant, 46*44mm heart pink dyed tourmaline $1.17 - $1.38 AKC77 24pcs leather cord acrylic beads hip hop keychain $45.04 - $52.99 IJW07 16 inches faceted round 14mm dyed imperial jasper beads $13.02 - $15.32 9SR110 oval citrine 925 sterling silver ring $38.85 - $45.71 SPW362 gemstone pendant, 45*35mm oval green dyed peridot $2.35 - $2.76 KZW03 multi-size round kunzite strand beads 15 inches $1.41 - $1.66 AKC70 24pcs leather triple alloy skull hip hop keychain $45.04 - $52.99 IJW32 15.5 inches nugget 17*14*13mm dyed imperial jasper beads $9.38 - $11.04 Shopping Cart 0 items Your Account Your Email Address Your Password Shop by Prices Under $1.00
From $1.00 to $1.50
From $1.50 to $3.00
From $3.00 to $5.00
From $5.00 to $8.00
From $8.00 to $10.00
From $10.00 to $14.00
From $14.00 to $18.00
From $18.00 to $25.00
From $25.00 to $50.00
From $50.00 to $100.00
From $100.00 to $200.00
$200.00 and above
Information Shipping Methods and Rates
The Choice of Payment Methods
Return Policy & Customer Guarantee
Jewelry Catalog Request
Exhibition Information
Japanese Akoya Pearls vs. Chinese Akoya Pearls
2008 Chinese Spring Festival Vacation
Gift Voucher FAQ
Reviews I purchased several of the pictured double-stranded necklace ..
Advance Search
Use keywords to find the product you are looking for.
Silver Jewelry Series Silver Pendants
Silver Earrings
Silver Finger Rings
Silver Anklets
Silver Bracelets
Silver Bangles
Silver Necklaces
Silver Brooches
Silver Children Jewelry
Silver Lover Jewelry
Silver Jewelry Set
Thai Silver Rings
Thai Silver Earrings
Thai Silver Pendants
Thai Silver Necklaces Sunday 07 March, 2010 Contact Us | Wedding Jewelry | 925 Silver Jewelry | Thai Silver Jewelry | Stainless Steel Jewelry | Jewelry Blog Wholesale Jewelry in China - Pearl jewelry, Wedding bridal jewelry, Handmade beaded jewelry, pandora jewelry, silver jewelry, pandora beads. Copyright© Hydia Pearl Limited. 2006-2010 All Rights Reserved.
other jewelry news:
HOW TO: Basic Techniques
Learn techniques for working with metal, metal clay, wire, and more!
view all booksBOOKS & SPECIAL ISSUES Wirework 2010
Wirework 2010 is packed with 30 ALL-NEW designs for necklaces, bracelets, earrings, and rings. You’ll learn techniques including wrapping, coiling, shaping, chainmaking, hammering, and more.
Learn more!
Order now!
Learn to make your own clasps
This DVD teaches you how to bend and form wire to make five different clasps to personalize your jewelry pieces.
Order today! Metal Clay Rings
Metal clay makes the creation of fine silver jewelry possible with instructions for making 18 beautifully designed, wearable rings.
Order today! What’s New?
Shopping List! Stock up now on the materials and supplies you’ll need to make the projects in the March 2010 issue of Art Jewelry
Forums Learn. Connect. Share.
Get involved today!
02/19/2010 02:31 PM
Friday Highlights from the Subscriber Gallery: Round 4, Kristin’s choice
HOW TO: Making a Bezel Associate editor Addie Kidd shows how to make a bezel.
Subscribe | Renew | Give a Gift BeadStyle Bead&Button Art Jewelry Bead&Button ShowFind a Class LOG IN | REGISTER
–> Contact Us | Customer Service
Sign up for Art Jewelry E-mail Newsletter
SEARCH MAGAZINE Current Issue Next Issue Special Issues How to Subscribe Subscriber Benefits Back Issues About art Jewelry Magazine Our Staff Contact the Editor Submit Content to the Magazine Advertising Press Room Customer Service Carry us in Your Store Take Our Survey PROJECTS Search Projects Projects for Sale Subscriber Exclusives Free Projects HOW TO Metal Clay Polymer Clay Metals Wirework Stone Settings Safety Basics Video VIDEOS Wire Metalsmithing Polymer Clay Metal Clay Enamel Tools From the Pages of Art Jewelry Interviews Beads, Baubles, and Jewels Featured Videos Jewelry Classes On Demand COMMUNITY Join Magazine Gallery Bonus Content Gallery Subscriber Gallery Forums Archived Forums Blog Take our Survey Wirework Journal RESOURCES Product Reviews Contacts & Suppliers Online Articles Reference Glossary Events Calendar Find a class Calculators Wallpaper STORE Art Jewelry Store All Beading & Jewelry Products All Kalmbach Publishing Products DOWNLOADABLE PROJECTS HOW TO Metal Clay Lentil Pendant Project by Deb Fitz Subscribers, download this Free Project! Learn how to add a bezel-set cab and keum-boo to a lentil pendant.
Learn how to make your own metal ingots
Community
Free Wire Project! For a limited time, learn how to use steel wire to capture focal objects
Subscriber Gallery
Subscriber & Member Log In E-mail Address: Password: Forgot your Password? Remember me Login Help Free Monthly Newsletter Privacy Policy ARTJEWELRYMAG.COM Site index SUBSCRIBE RENEW GIVE A GIFT LOGIN CUSTOMER SERVICE E-MAIL NEWSLETTER BUY: Projects | Books | Back Issues MAGAZINES: Current Issue | Next Issue | Special Issues | How To Subscribe | Subscriber Benefits | Back Issues | About Art Jewelry Magazine | Our Staff | Letter to the Editor | Submit Content to the Magazine | Advertising | Carry Us in Your Store
PROJECTS: Search Projects | Projects for Sale | Subscriber Exclusives | Free Projects
HOW TO: Metal Clay | Polymer Clay | Soldering | Wirework | Stone Setting
VIDEOES: Wire | Metalsmithing | Polymer Clay | Metal Clay | Enamel | Tools | From the pages of Art Jewelry | Interviews | Beads, Baubles, and Jewels | Featured Videos | Jewelry Classes On Demand
COMMUNITY: Join | Magazine Gallery | Subscriber Gallery | Forums | Blog | Take our Survey | Wirework Journal
RESOURCES: Events Calendar | Find a Class | Product Reviews | Contacts & Suppliers | Online Articles | Calculators | Wallpaper
STORE: Art Jewelry Store | All Kalmbach Publishing Products RSS FEED INFORMATION–> Top banner jewelry piece by Melissa Muir Copyright © 2010, Kalmbach Publishing Co. Contact | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy More trusted sites from Kalmbach Publishing Co.: American Snowmobiler | Art Jewelry | Astronomy | Bead&Button | Bead&Button Show | BeadStyle | Birder’s World | Cabin Life | Classic Toy Trains | Classic Trains | Finescale Modeler | Garden Railways | Model Railroader | Scale Auto | Trains Magazine | Trains.com | The Writer
Jewelry Classes on Demand
a fast, affordable and ultra-convenient way to learn to make fashionable jewelry.
02/15/2010 11:00 AM
“Friday” Highlights from the Subscriber Gallery: Round 4, Addie’s choices
Editors’ Blog
See a gallery of jewelry by students at Terri McCarthy Studios in Grafton, Wis.
Not a Member?
Register | Why Join?
online poll This issue’s Stone Sense column is all about included quartz! Rutilated quartz is also known as: [Visit our Editors' Blog on March 11th for the answer.] “The Emperor’s Needles”
“Venus’ Hair Stone”
“Golden Gossamer”
Download a new desktop wallpaper for your computer featuring Melissa Muir’s fabricated silver lily brooch!
New Video! Watch an Art Jewelry editor saw metal for the first time
Register online for access to more valuable resource information.
Don’t miss your connection to the reader forum, free projects, how to videos, and more.
03/05/2010 08:00 AM
Friday Highlights from the Subscriber Gallery: Round 5: Jill’s choice
Find out what we thought of the Fretz Presicionsmith raising hammer, the Sh.A.R.K. polymer clay cutting edge, and Thomas Mann’s Learn to Saw kit
Become a Member
Learn all about files, including cuts, shapes, sizes, special varieties, and cleaning
Capture Objects in Steel Wire by Brenda Schweder
For a limited time, download this Free Wire Project! Learn how to capture a focal object in low-cost steel wire.
New Metal Clay Project: Take a Basic Metal clay Lentil Pendant to New Levels
© 2010 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. nw17
/catalog/category.do, /catalog/category/baseCategoryContainer.jsp
/catalog/category/baseCategoryContainer.jsp
category id: 3896 path: 0:3891:3896 Choose Your Local Store
close
There is an error below. There are errors below.
You can change your store any time by using the "Find in Store" feature or by using your local Store Finder.
–>
–>
–>
–>
Jewelry Entire Site Jewelry Apparel Baby Books Electronics Gifts Grocery Health & Beauty For the Home Movies & TV Music Pets Pharmacy Photo Center Outdoor Living Sports & Fitness Toys Video Games Help
Track Order My Account My Wedding Registry
My Baby Registry
My Pharmacy Account
My Wish List
My Store Shopping List Sign in to view your account.
Create a new Walmart.com account.
View your Orders
Find another store
Enter ZIP Code or city and state.
ZIP Code –OR–
City State — Select One –
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Armed Forces Americas
Armed Forces Pacific
Armed Forces other
American Samoa
Guam
Northern Mariana Islands
Palau
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands There are no Local Ads at this time.
Online Specials
Rollbacks –> Baby Registry
Wedding Registry
Wish List
Gift Cards Order Number (13 digits): Please enter a valid order number.
Your Local Store Has Been Saved
WALMART CREDIT CARDS Apply Now
Card Benefits
Business Credit Cards
Manage Your Account Walmart.com About Walmart.com
Terms of Use
Affiliate Program
International Customers
About Our Ads
See All Departments Stores & Corporate Store Finder
Corporate Website
Investor Relations
Privacy & Security
Associate Discount
California Privacy Rights
Careers at Walmart Help Help Center
Track Your Order
Returns Policy
Return an Item
Product Recalls
Contact Us
Now when you browse Walmart.com, you’ll see information about the products carried in the [city name] store.
- OR -
You are here:
Home Page > Jewelry > Rings Shop
Jewelry Jewelry Rings All Rings Bands Class Rings Fashion Rings Personalized Rings Promise Rings Wedding & Engagement Shop by Material Diamond
Silver
White Gold
Yellow Gold Special Offers Clearance
Rollback Now At Wal-Mart Classifieds Rings: Rollback 1/2 Carat T.W. Diamond Bridal Set in 14kt White Gold
$299.00 His Classic Oval Personalized
$80.00 - $700.00 Her Classic Oval Personalized
$80.00 - $375.00 Keepsake Personalized Enamored Promise Ring with Birthstones
$78.00 - $278.00 Keepsake Personalized Faith Ring
$70.00 - $248.00 Her Princess-Cut Personalized Class Ring
$178.00 - $348.00 1/3 Carat T.W. Round and Baguette Diamond Bridal Set in 14kt Yellow Gold
$399.00 Her Glamour 140
$219.00 - $300.00 Men’s Limited Edition Valadium Class Ring
$50.00 Women’s Limited Edition Valadium Class Ring
$50.00 10kt gold over Sterling Silver Simulated Majestic Ring
$100.00 - $348.00 Keystone Guy’s Signet Ring in Valadium
$78.00 Her USA
$158.00 - $450.00 Personalized Men’s Service Ring
$166.66 - $537.50 Keepsake Personalized Luxe Ring
$90.00 - $410.00 See all: Engagement Rings Personalized Rings All Rollback Shop our best sellers now to see which products customers like you are buying most. See all Best Sellers Every Day Low Prices just got lower. Check out our selection of engagement rings under $500. See all Engagement Rings Under $500 Say "forever" with a stunning engagement ring, wedding band, three stone ring or solitaire. Solitaires
Bridal Sets
Wedding & Anniversary Bands
See all:
Wedding & Engagement Rings Make a loving promise with a sweet promise ring, available in diamond and gemstone styles. See all Promise Rings
in the last 90 days
Departments Jewelry Services Apparel Movies & TV Shows Classifieds Baby Music CDs Gift Registry Books Music Downloads Money Center Computers Pets Wish List Contact Lenses Pharmacy In Stores Now Electronics Photo Center Food & Recipes Center For the Home Outdoor Living Health & Wellness Center Furniture Sports & Fitness New in Stores Gifts Tires Walmart Events Gift Cards Toys Help Grocery Video Games Ordering Health & Beauty In Stores Now Shipping & Returns
Signet Rings Direct From The Craftsmen, For Quality & Value
Dexter Signet Rings have an international reputation second to none. Able to deep engrave both gemstones and precious metals Dexter are a company of select master craftsmen unique in the world today ….More | Enter The Bespoke Gallery
Dexter are the premier seal ring engravers, producing individual bespoke engraved seal rings & ranges of personalised jewellery. ….More | Find Our About Our Unique Pledge
Perhaps you would prefer something different a company logo, club badge or something a little more personal? DEEP Engraved: Silver Gold Platinum & Now NEW Titanium Rings
DEEP Engraved: Cufflinks, Pendants / Charms, Desk Seals & Signet Rings.   NEW: ’Cigar Band’ Style Rings:
Engraved with a design of your choice Find out more SEE OUR PRODUCTS…
SEE MORE Alternatively: Customisable Designs - Available For You to Buy Online Today. MONOGRAMS…
Variety of styles available on rings pendants and cufflinks. see more… FAMILY ARMS RANGE…
Coat of arms styles personalised with your family details. see more… POPULAR DESIGNS…
See our most requested designs or request your own! Deep engraved to any item. see more… MASONIC…
Masonic designs available on cufflinks pedants or charms. see more… SCOTTISH & IRISH…
We engrave ANY clan badge or crest, a selection of examples available. see more… HERALDIC…
Deep engrave from your own artwork, blazon / description - ANY design. see more…
ALSO SEE: Non-Heraldic | Fraternity | Military | University | Corporate or Clubs | Wedding Gifts | Religious | Reproduction
Dexter Seal Engraving - Studio 7 - Windmill Farm - Benenden Road - Rolvenden - Kent - TN17 4PF - UK - Tel +44 (0) 1580 241 680 - USA: 617 418 3733
Dexter Seal Engraving Company V.A.T. Reg. No. 740 0428 72
Copyright © 1999 - 2010 Dexter Seal Engraving Knights Templar Seal Ring | Bespoke Catalogue | Product Overview | Family Seal Rings | Clan Signet Rings | Popular Designs | Heraldic Beasts | Buying Guide | More About Dexter | What is a Dexter Seal Ring | Dexter Quality | About Our Security | Our Guarantee | Track Your Order | Contact Details | Links | Gold Signet Rings | Grenadier Guards & Spiderman! | Polish Eagle & Assorted | Cornelian & Gold | Dragons Rampant & Lions Passant | Wax Impressions | Rampant Lion & Assorted | American Heraldry & Regimental | Sardonyx & Gemstone | Lions of England & Vatican Seal | Coats of Arms & Family Crests
” border=”0″> –> Companies In The News Companies In The News Feb 24, 2010 (MFN) Bearish MACD for Minefinders - Zacks.com Feb 24, 2010 (GGC.TO) Genco Adopts Shareholder Rights Plan - CCNMatthews Feb 24, 2010 (GAM.TO) Gammon Gold to Release 2009 Year End Financial Results on March 30, 2010 - CNW Group Feb 24, 2010 (MAI.TO) Minera Andes Announces Management Changes - Marketwire Feb 24, 2010 (TREVF.PK) Trevali Announces Infrastructure Upgrades in Santander District - Marketwire Feb 24, 2010 (GRS) Gammon Gold to Release 2009 Year End Financial Results on March 30, 2010 - PR Newswire Feb 24, 2010 (SQI.V) Silver Quest Resources Ltd.: Davidson Property 2010 Exploration Program Announced - CCNMatthews Feb 24, 2010 (HL) HECLA MINING CO/DE/ Financials - EDGAR Online Financials Feb 24, 2010 (GRS) Ignore the Illusion of Spring in the Markets - Ian Gordon - at Seeking Alpha Feb 23, 2010 (SVM.TO) Silvercorp to Acquire Advanced Stage Silver-Lead-Zinc Project in British Columbia, Canada - Marketwire Feb 23, 2010 (AUM.TO) Golden Minerals Reports 2009 Year-End Results - Marketwire Feb 23, 2010 (PAAS) Block Traders Go For Gold - at Forbes.com More … “> ” border=”0″> –> Recently In Silver Recently in Silver Feb 24, 2010 Silver Declines: More Bad News for Precious Metals Ahead? - Prieur du Plessis Feb 24, 2010 A Long-Term Look at Silver - Jordan Roy-Byrne Feb 24, 2010 Silver ETFs surge at COMEX Ishares Silver Trust - CommodityOnline.com Feb 24, 2010 I Suspect Gold and Silver Prices Will Proceed to Rise From Here - Franklin Sanders Feb 24, 2010 Weighing Gold’s True Performance in Various Currencies - Ashraf Laidi Feb 24, 2010 Renewed Interest in a Tax on Stocks Proves Metals Are the Place to Be - Dr. Jeff Lewis Feb 24, 2010 Precious Metals’ Correlation With the General Market - Przemyslaw Radomski Feb 24, 2010 Nickel, Gold And Uranium Mining Stocks May Offer Longer-Term Opportunity - iStockAnalyst.com Feb 24, 2010 Platinum, Palladium Could Be White Hot - WSJ Feb 24, 2010 Silver May Drop 11% to $14, Barclays Says: Technical Analysis - Bloomberg More … ” border=”0″> –> Big Picture Big Picture Feb 24, 2010 Still Living in a U.S. Dollar Centric World - Justice Litle Feb 24, 2010 U.S. 1800 Bank Failures Financial Tsunami on Horizon - Fresbee Feb 24, 2010 Gold-backed ETFs rise by 3.872 tonnes - CommodityOnline.com Feb 24, 2010 No Banker Left Behind - Robert Scheer Feb 24, 2010 In Defense of Financial Speculation - Darrell Duffie Feb 24, 2010 It is Nickel boom in China - CommodityOnline.com Feb 24, 2010 Base metal may trade choppy: SMC Research - Myiris.com Feb 24, 2010 Consumer Confidence Plunges, Comex Gold Options Expiration - Patrick Heller Feb 23, 2010 Rio’s new program for rapid construction of deep underground mines - John Chadwick Feb 23, 2010 Gold Volatility Whips Market - Patrick Heller More … “> ” border=”0″> –> Chart Gallery Chart Gallery –> ” border=”0″> –> What’s New? eTV & eRadio Links Feb 24, 2010 - Is the Euro Terminal? An Interview with Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
McAlvany.com Feb 24, 2010 - An Interview with Hernando de Soto
McAlvany.com Feb 24, 2010 - Marc Faber interviewed by Financial Times
FT.com More … Coming Events Howestreet.com Langley Money Expo
February 27, 2010 PDAC International Convention
Mar 07 - 10, 2010 Howestreet.com Kelowna Money Expo
March 13, 2010 Singapore Silver Summit
March 29, 2010 Vancouver Money Show
Apr 06 - 08, 2010 Calgary Resource Investment Conference
Apr 10 - 11, 2010 Hong Kong Money Show
Apr 21 - 23, 2010 Silver Use:
“> Classics Classics A revolution to begin in gold and silver trading
Stewart Thomson
Feb 24, 2010
Silver-investor.com Silverminers.com Silverinstitute.org US Geological Survey 24hpm.com Joe F. Rocks Silver Stock Report More Links … Home Performance Editorials News Links Silver Story Silver Use Glossary About Contact Top Performing Stocks Symbol% Change EPZ.V13.16 SVM.TO11.26 APE.V9.09 ORM.V0 SNS.V0 UC.V0 WS.V0 BCM.V-0.53 SLW.TO-1.09 MAI.TO-1.33 Note: Based on daily close prices.    Company of the day:
Esperanza Silver
Esperanza Silver Corporation is an emerging gold and silver producer committed to the development of its two late-stage projects. Since startup in 2002 its geologists have discovered two exceptional gold projects – San Luis, a joint venture in Peru and the 100%-owned Cerro Jumil in Mexico.     Top Ranked Companies by Total Silver …a word about our rankings.   –>    –>Metal Quotes MetalPrice%As Of Aluminum $0.94 -0.24 2/24/10 21:49 Copper $3.24 0.07 2/24/10 22:17 Lead $1.00 0.46 2/24/10 21:33 Nickel $9.17 -0.57 2/24/10 22:04 Zinc $0.99 0.69 2/24/10 22:06   Perma-Links New Silver Catalyst Purifies Diesel Emissions and Reduces Costs
  Visitor Feedback First Name: Last Name: Email: Rate This Site: Excellent Good Needs Improvement Poor Fav Page: Home Ranking Company Profile Editorials Fav Author: —Select Author— A. E. Fekete Aaron Levitt Aaron Saenz Aaron Task ABC News Adam Brochert Adam Hamilton Adam Hamilton Adam Sharp Aden sisters Adrian Ash Adrian Burridge Adrian Douglas Adrian Michaels Agam Shah Agora Financial Ajay Kedia Alan Bush Alan Kohler ALAN SAYRE Alec Hogg Alex Dumortier Alex Emery Alex Epstein Alex Stanczyk Alex Wallenwein Alf Field Alistair Dawber Alistair Gilbert Alix Steel Allen Sykora Amanda B. Kish Ambrose Evans- Pritchard Ambrose Evans-Pritchard Amena Bakr Amit R. Paley Ana Isabel Martinez Anand Rawani Andre Gratian Andrea Jaramillo and Drew Benson Andreas Viklund Andrew Gordon Andrew Horowitz Andrew Jeffery Andrew Mickey Andrew Moran Andrew Oxlade Andrew Packer Andrew Tanzer Andy Hoffman Andy Home Andy McSmith Andy Sutton Angelika Christie Angelo Campione Angus Campbell Anna Coulling ANNA MARIA BASQUEZ Antal E Fekete Antal E. Fekete Anthony Cherniawski Anthony Davian Anthony G. Martin AOIFE WHITE AP Armando Duke Aryeh Katz ASHLEY PHILLIPS Ashraf Laidi Asif Salahuddin Associated Press Austin Jenkins Avery Goodman Axel Merk Barclays Global Investors Barrick Gold Barry Critchley Barry Fitzgerald Barry Sergeant Becky Kramer Behrouz Fallahi Ben Harrington Ben Rooney Ben Steverman Bespoke Investment Group Big Jake Bill Bonner Bill Cara Bill Downey Bill Fleckenstein Bill Gross Bill Harcourt Bill McLaren Bill Murphy Bill Rempel Bill Rummel Bill Schmick Bill West Bix Weir Blanchard & Co. Bob Blandeburgo Bob Chapman Bob Hoye Bob Irish Bob Moriarty Bob Prechter Bob Swarup Bob van der Valk Bob Willis and Courtney Schlisserman Boris Sobolev Brad Zigler Brady Willett Brenda Bouw Bret Rosenthal BRETT ARENDS Brewer Futures Group Brian Bloom Brian Gomez Brian Hicks Brian O’Keefe Brian Trumbore Bron Suchecki Bruce Edwards Bruce Jackson Bruce Pile Bud Conrad Bullish Bankers Bureau News Business Day Business International Business Line Business News Business Reporter Business Standard BUSINESS WIRE Byron King Canada NewsWire Canada Press Capital Spectator CAPS Blog Captain Hook Carlos Gonzalez Carole Bass Caroline Bellamy CAROLYN CUI Carter Thompson Casey Files: David Galland Casey Research Cathy Laperle Central Fund of Canada Limited Chanyaporn Chanjaroen and Shruti Date Singh Charles Barton Charles Cohen Charles Goyette Charles Rotblut Charles Savoie Charles Scaliger Charlie Kuchinsky Charting Stocks Chaya Cooperberg Chikako Mogi China Daily Chintan Karnani Chip Hanlon Chris Ciovacco Chris Devonshire-Ellis Chris Flood Chris Laird Chris Mayer CHRIS MCGREAL Chris Meyer Chris Mull Chris Mullen Chris Powell Chris V. Nicholson Chris Vemeulen Chris Vermeulen Chris Weber Chris Woltermann Christian Charest Christian Normann Christopher Barker Christopher Johnson Christopher Laird Claer Barrett Claude Sandroff Claudene Wharton Clif Droke Cliff Droke Cliff Pletschet Clive Maund CNW Telbec Cobar Consolidated Resources Coin Update CoinNews.net Colin Barr Colin Cieszynski College Analysts Commodities Bureau Commodity News Center Commodity Online Commodity Watch Radio Connie Madon Conrad de Aenlle Corey Christiansen CPM Group CQ Transcripts Wire Craig Welch CREDIT BUBBLE BULLETIN Daily Bell Daily Times Daisy Maxey Dallas Business Journal Dan Caplinger Dan Denning Dan Eden Dan Norcini Dan Perkins Dan Weil Dana Hedgpeth and Dan Keating Daniel Amerman Daniel Gilbert Daniel Harrison Daniel O’Sullivan Daniel R. Amerman Daniel Willis Darrell Duffie Darrin Lee Unser Darryl R Schoon Darryl Robert Schoon Darryl Schoon Daryl Montgomery Dave Carpenter Dave Mock David Banister David Berman David Bond David C. Harpe David C. Harper David Campbell David Coffin & Eric Coffin David Coffin and Eric Coffin David Eifrig David Ellis David Fessler David Galland David Hirst David Hunkar DAVID JOLLY David K. Randall David Kamm David L. Ganz David Levenstein David Lew DAVID McHUGH David Morgan David Morgan & Tom Jeffries David Murphy David N. Vaughn David Nichols David Parkinson David Petch David Roskoph David Rozenberg David Shvartsman David Stanway David Stevenson David Vaughn David White David Zanoni DEEPCASTER LLC Dennis Cajigas Derek Blain Derek Thompson Devin Brady Devvy Kidd Dhimant Bhatt Dian L.Chu DIAN VUJOVICH Diana Ransom Dirk Van Dijk Domenico Montanaro Dominic Frisby Dominic Lau Dominic O’Connell and Iain Dey Don Dion Don Macdonald Don Miller Don Pittis Don Sherman Don Stott Donald Luskin Donald W. Pendergast Donn Pearlman Dorothy Kosich Doug Casey Doug French Doug Hadfield Doug Hornig Doug J. Swanson DOUG NADVORNICK Doug Noland Douglas Gnazzo Douglas V. Gnazzo Dow Jones Newswires Dr. Allen Arper Dr. Christian Normann Dr. Duru Dr. Ellen Brown Dr. Jeff Lewis Dr. Jeffrey Lewis Drew Carter Dudley Baker Dudley P. Baker Dudley Pierce Bake Dudley Pierce Baker Duncan Cameron Easier Media Ltd. Economic Forecasts & Opinions Ed Zimmer Edward Harrison Egon von Greyerz Eidetic Research Elaine Frei Elaine Meinel Supkis Elisabeth Behrmann Elise Stolte Elizabeth Stanton Ellen Brown Ellen Roseman Emanuel Balarie Eric Bethel Eric deCarbonnel Eric Dutram Eric Hommelberg Eric Janszen Eric Lam Eric Mancini Eric Morrison Eric Onstad Eric Reguly Eric Roseman Eric Sprott Eric Sprott & Sasha Solunac Eric Sprott and Sasha Solunac Erik Bethel Erin Breen Ernst & Young Ethan Huff Euan Rocha Eurasia Capital Evan Pickworth Everyday Finance F. Momolu Dorley F. William Engdahl Feiwen Rong Felix Kramer Fernando Cabrera Diaz Financial Post Fiona Bond First Coast News FOFOA FOX BUSINESS Frank Ahrens Frank Holmes Frank Tang and Jan Harvey Frank Tang and Karl Plume Franklin Sanders Fred Cederholm Fred Reed Galina Zevelyova Garry White Gary Dorsch Gary Gordon Gary Lamphier Gary North Gary Shepherd Gary Tanashian Geena Paul Gene Arensberg Gene Mitchell Geoff Candy Geoff Foster Geoff Gandy Geoff Metcalf Geoffrey Lean George Cocalis George Dooley Gerald Celente Gerard Jackson Gillian Wee Glenn Neely Glenn Somerville Glenys Sim Globe Investor Gold Investments GoldSeek.com Radio Graeme Brown Graham Bentley Graham Summers Greg Canavan Greg McCoach Greg McCoach, Greg Peel Greg Perlin Greg Robb Greg Sushinsky Gregor Macdonald Gregory Thomas Gretchen Morgenson Gustavo Palencia Guy Lerner Guy Quenneville Guy Rocha Hahn Investment Halia Pavliva Hard Asset Investor Harold Goodman Harry Miller Harvey Beltrán Heather Bell Heather Connon Heather Struck Henk Krasenberg Henrique Almeida Henry C K Liu Holly Cook Horacio Marquez Howard Katz Howard Ruff Howard S. Katz Hubert Moolman Hugo Salinas Price Humeyra Pamuk Ian Lamont IANTHE JEANNE DUGAN IE Staff Indra Bhadra Insignia Consultants Investment Scoring and Timing Newsletter Ira Epstein Israel Friedman Izabella Kaminska J Clinton Hill J. Christoph Amberger J. Kent Willis J. R. Nyquist J. S. Kim Jack Adamo Jack Chan Jack Crooks Jack Spirko Jake Towne James Barrett James Brumley James Burbage James Chen James Conrad James Cordier James Grant James Hamilton James Howard Kunstler James Macfarlane James Moore James Owen James Petras James Picerno James Quinn James Regan James Saft James Stafford JAMES T. AREDDY James Turk James Turk and John Rubino James West Jamie Ashcroft Jamie Freed Jan Harvey Jane C. Parikh & Kalamazoo Gazette Jared Irish Jason Cozens Jason Hamlin Jason Hommel Jason Hommel and Theodore Terbolizard Jason Ruspini Jason Simpkins Javier Blas Jay DeVincentis Jay Taylor JCK India Jeff Clark Jeff Clark (Casey Research) Jeff Lewis Jeff Miller Jeff Nichols Jeff Nielson Jeff Opdyke Jeff Poppenhagen Jeff St. John Jefffrey Nichols Jeffrey Lewis Jeffrey Ng Jeffrey Nichols Jeffrey Saut Jennifer Barry Jennifer Schonberger Jens Erik Gould Jerome R. Corsi Jesse Riseborough Jesse Wojdylo Jesse’s Café Américain Jessica Mead Jim Cramer Jim Deeds Jim Grant Jim Jones Jim Mosquera Jim Nelson Jim Quinn Jim Regan Jim Robinson Jim Scherrer Jim Sinclair Jim Willie Jim Willie CB Jim Willie, CB Joan Delaney Joanne Nova Jock Nunan Jody Shenn Joe Mont Joe Weisenthal Joel Bowman Joel Schoppig JOHN ANASTASI John Barrette John Browne John Chadwick John Crane John Curran John Dobosz JOHN G. EDWARDS John Hollenhorst john Hussman John Kipphoff John Kutyn John Lee John Lounsbury John M. Peters John Mauldin John Morrissy John Nadler John P. Hussman John P. Hussman, Ph.D John Petersen John Rubino John Senff John Steele Gordon John Wagonner John Williams Johnny Silver Bear Jon Cloke Jon Herring Jon Nadler Jon Nones Jonathan Ratner Jordan Kahn Jordan Roy-Byrne Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT Joseph Brusuelas JOSEPH GOLDSTEIN Joseph L. Shaefer Joseph L.Shaefer Joseph Peden Joseph Russo Joseph Somsel Joseph Trevisani Josh Burnett Josh Lipton Josh Patt Joyce Koh Judith Shaw Judy Shelton Juerg Kiener Julia Kollewe Julian D. Phillips Julian D. W. Phillips Julian D.W. Phillips Julian DW Phillips Julian Emerson Julian Murdoch Julian Phillips Julie French JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS Julie Jason Julius Zheng Justice Litle Jutia Group Karen De Coster Karl Denninger Kate Gibson Kathy Kristof Kathy Mahdoubi Kathy Stevens Kedia Commodities Keith Evans Kéllia Ramares Kent Harper Kerry Rodgers Kevin Baker Kevin Depew Kevin Grawal Kevin Grewal Kevin Kerr Kevin Stecyk Kim Jae-kyoung Kim Kyoungwha Kishori Krishnan Kristin Butler Kristine Owram Kurt Brouwer Kurt Cobb Kurt Kasun Lara Crigger LARRY AVILA Larry Edelson Larry King Larry LaBorde Larry Spears Lauren Lowrey Lawerence Reed Lawrence B. Lindsey LAWRENCE C. STRAUSS Lawrence Carrel Lawrence Delevingne Lawrence Roulston Lawrence Weinman Lawrence Williams Lee Lowell Leon Westgate Lerwen Liu Lesley Wroughton Leslie Josephs Lew Rockwell Lewa Pardomuan Lewis Seiler, Dan Hamburg Li Xiaowei Liezel Hill Lisa Bellavin, Lisa Chamoff Lisa Reisman Lizel Hill Lois M.Collins London Telegraph Lorenzo Montana Lorimer Wilson Lorraine Halsted Louis James Louis James & Andrey Dashkov Louis Winthorp LUCY BATTERSBY Ludwig von Mises Luke Burgess Luke Mullins Lulu Chiang Lynne Boezaart | The Muskegon Chronicle Mac Slavo Manasee S. Gokhale Manisha Gupta Marc Chandler Marc Courtenay Marc Davis Marc Faber Marco G. MARGARET TALEV Marilyn M. Barnewall Marin Katusa Mario Innecco Mark Anthony Mark Biller Mark Brown Mark Davis Mark Heinzl Mark Herpel MARK HOLLINGSWORTH Mark Johnson Mark Nestmann Mark O’Byrne Mark O`Byrne Mark O’Byrne Mark OByrne Mark Pittman and Bob Ivry Mark Rasmussen Mark Taylor Market Folly MARKET WIRE Martin Creamer Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D. Martin Goldberg Martin Hutchinson Martin Weiss Martin Weiss PhD Marty Chenard Marvin Clark Mary Anne & Pamela Aden Mary Anne Aden and Pamela Aden Mary Anne and Pamela Aden Matt Badiali Matt Egan Matt Simmons Matt Townsend Matt Walcoff Matt Whittaker Matthew Bradbard Matthew Collins Matthew Hougan McClellan Financial Publications Inc. Melinda Beck Melinda Peer Melissa Pistilli Merv Burak Michael "Woody" O’Brien Michael Berry Michael Feller Michael Hampton Michael J. Kosares Michael Johnston MICHAEL KAHN Michael Kilbach Michael Kohn Michael Kosares Michael Neibauer Michael Pento Michael Pollick Michael R. Mapa Michael S. Fulp Michael S. Rozeff Michael Swanson Michelle Graff Mickey Fulp Miho Yoshikawa Mike "Mish" Shedlock Mike Burk Mike Caggeso Mike Hewitt Mike Hoy Mike Kachanovsky Mike King Mike Larson Mike Mills Mike Niehuser Mike Paulenoff Mike Price Mike Shedlock Mike Swanson Mike Unser Mike Whitney Minati Singha Mineweb Radio Mining Journal Mish Shedlock Mish’s Global Economic Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd. Moby Waller Mogambo Guru Moming Zhou Moming Zhou & Myra P. Saefong Money And Markets Money Matters Morgan Housel Motley Fool Murray Pollitt Murray Rothbard Myra P. Saefong Myra P. Saefong & Polya Lesova Myra Saefong Nadeem Walayat Natalie Simmons Nathalie Thomas NATHAN BRUTTELL Nathan Burchfiel Nathan Martin Ned W Schmidt Ned W. Schmidt Neil Charnock Nell Sloane News Bites Nicholas Larkin Nicholas Larkin and Kyoungwha Kim Nicholas Larkin and Luzi Ann Javier Nicholas Larkin and Pham-Duy Nguyen Nick Barisheff Nick Gogerty Nick Hassel Nick Hodge Nick Jones Nick Thomas Nick Trevethan Nilus Mattive Nirmal Bang Nirmal Bing Noah Goetzel Numismatic News Olga Popova Oliver Garrett Olivia and Tatiana Van Vredenburch Olivier Garret Olivier Tischendorf Option Armageddon Owen Vater Paco Ahlgren Pam Martens Paola Totaro Parker Binion Patrice Johnson Patrick A. Heller Patrick Chovanec Patrick Heller Patrick Killelea Paul Amery Paul Caudell Paul Craig Roberts PAUL HANNON and NICHOLAS WINNING Paul J Nolte Paul J. Lamont Paul Kasriel Paul Lamont Paul Larson Paul Luke Paul M. Green Paul Mladenovic Paul Mladjenovic Paul Mladjenovic, CFP Paul R. La Monica Paul Roberts Paul Saur Paul Tolnai Paul van Eeden Paula C. Squires PeoplesDaily Peter Brimelow Peter Charalambous Peter Cooper Peter Degraaf Peter F. Way Peter Grant Peter Grant & Jonathan Kosares Peter Harrop Peter J. Cooper PETER KOVEN Peter Krauth Peter Rosenstreich Peter Schiff Peter Souleles Peter Spina Peter Taylor Peter Zihlmann Pham-Duy Nguyen Phil Flynn Phil Maymin Phil Streible Philip Dunham Plexus Group Polina Devitt and Aleksandras Budrys Polina Devitt and Robin Paxton Polya Lesova Prieur du Plessis Przemyslaw Radomski Puru Saxena Quint Tatro R.W. Julian R.W. Julian, Coins Magazine Rachel Ehrenberg Rachel Graham Rajesh Bhayani Rajesh Bhayani & Dilip Jha Raktima Bose Ralph Johnston RANDALL W. FORSYTH Randolph Buss Ray Istre Ray Tato RD Gupta Reg Ogden Reggie Middleton Reginald H. Howe Reinhard Seiser Religare Commodities Reuters Rhona O’Connell Rich Duprey Richard Benson Richard Blackwell Richard C. Cook Richard Daughty Richard Evans Richard Giedroyc Richard Greene Richard Heinberg Richard J Greene Richard J. Greene Richard Russell Richard Shaw Richard Suttmeier Rick Ackerman Rick Lee Rick Mills Rivington Street Holdings Rob Delaney Rob Kirby Rob Mackinlay ROBB M. STEWART Robert Arber Robert Barron, Staff Writer Robert Colby Robert J. Samuelson ROBERT J. SHILLER Robert Lenzner Robert McHugh Robert Miller Robert Morley Robert Perrego Robert Prechter Robert Scheer Robert Singer Robert Stavins Robert Tarzwell Robert Tyerman Robin Bromby Robin Pagnamenta Robin Trehan Rod Blake Roger Weigand Roger Wiegand Roland Watson Ron Cooke Ron Paul Ron Rosen Ron Rowland Ronald R Cooke Ronald Rosen Ronald Solberg Ross Kerber Ross Louthean Roy Martens Ruchira Singh Ryan Carter Saeed Azhar and Neil Chatterjee Salman Partners Salt Lake Tribune Sam Collins Sam Coventry Sam Mamudi Sam Mathid Sam Nemazie Sandeep Singh SARA LEPRO Sara Nunnally Sara Patterson Sarah Marsh and Jan Harvey Scotia Mocatta Scott Burns Scott Harn Scott Lanman SCOTT ROCHFORT Scott Wright Scott Wright Sean Brodrick Sean Hyman Sean Mason Sean Rakhimov Shashank Shekhar Shelby Moore Sherril Sego SHIRLEY WON Sify Business Silver Coins Today Silver Institute Silver Valley Mining Association SilverStrategies.com Simon Casey Simon Constable Simon Falush Simon Maierhofer Sol Palha Sovereign Society Stacy Schultz Stanislav Ivanov, Svetoslav Trapkov, and Krassimir Stefan M.I. Karlsson Stefan Pernar Stephen Bernard Stephen Clayson Stephen Kovaka Stephen Leeb Stephen Roseman Steve Christ Steve James Steve Kelman Steve Mason Steve Sarnoff Steve Saville Steve St. Angelo Steve Waldman Steve Watson Steven Halpern Steven Lamb STEVEN M. SEARS Steven Vincent STEVENSON JACOBS Stewart Bailey Stewart Bailey and Rob Delaney Stewart Dougherty Stewart Thomson Stuart Burns Subir Bhaumik Summer Said Sungwoo Park SUNNY FREEMAN Suresh Nandi Suresh P. Iyengar Suzanne McGee SWANSY AFONSO Sylvia Anderson TAKESHI HAMANA Tamara Thoene Ted Butler Terence Chan Terry Coxon Terry Maurer Terry Savage Terry Woo The Aden Sisters The Appenzell Daily Bell The Associated Press The Bullion Buzz The Capital Spectator The Casey Report The Daily Bell The Economic Times The Gold Report The Golden Value of Reliable Numbskulls The Mess that Greenspan Made The Mogambo Guru The Oil Drum The Post Monitoring The Pragmatic Capitalist The Sunday Times The Sydney Morning Herald The Times The Vancouver Sun The Wall Street Journal theaustralian.com.au Theodore Butler Theodore Dalrymple Thom Calandra Thomas Chaize Thomas E. Woods, Jr Thomas E. Woods, Jr. Thomas Kohlmann Thomas Tan Thomson Financial Tiffany Notes Tim Culpan Tim Grant Tim Iacono Tim Wood Timothy Green Timothy R. Homan Timothy Silvers Toby Birch Todd Shriber Tom Cash Tom Dyson Tom LaMarre Tom Leonard Tom Lydon Tom Stundza Tom Szabo Tom Van Riper Tom Woods Toni Straka Tony Davis TONY MARTIN Trace Mayer Trace Mayer, J.D. Tracy Alloway Trader Mark Trader’s Blog TradingMarkets.com Travis Johnson Troy Schwensen Ty Andros Tyler Durden Tyler Mordy U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission Universal Coin & Bullion VALERIE MILLER Van Sievers Venkatesan Vembu Victoria Marklew Victoria Papandrea Vijay L Bhambwani Vince Veneziani Vincent Bressler Vitaliy Katsenelson Vlada Kynsky Vladimir Kroupnik VM Group W Joseph Stroupe Walter de Wet Warren Bevan Wendy Lynn Ip Wesley Millett and Gerald White Whiskey & Gunpowder Wilfred Hahn Willem Buiter William (Bill) Buckler William Engdahl William George Shuster William Greider William Patalon III William R. Thomson William Rees-Mogg WILLIAM YARDLEY Wistar Holt World Coin News Wouter Klijn WSJ via GATA Ya Ling Your Daily Dose Zachary Scheidt Zhou Jingzhen Would You Recommend This Site To Others? YesNo Please Add Your Comments: Tell us how we can make this site better.     
Glossary Search
Silver $15.87 -0.10 Gold $1095.50 -1.70 Platinum $1513.00 5.00 Palladium $423.00 2.00 Usd $80.94 0.17 Crude oil $80.06 0.06
“> Featured Companies Featured Companies Abcourt Mines Arian Silver Apogee Minerals Avino Mines Aura Silver Bear Creek Coeur d’Alene Global Minerals ECU Silver Endeavour Silver Esperanza Silver First Majestic Genco Garibaldi Geologix Explorations Great Panther Huldra Silver Hecla Impact Silver Kimber Resources Kootenay Gold MAG Silver Minera Andes Minefinders Mines Management Minco Silver Orko Silver Oremex Resources Oro Silver Pan American Paramount Gold & Silver Revett Minerals Sabina Silver Silver Wheaton Silvermex Resources SNS Silver Source Exploration Silver Quest Silver Standard SilverCrest Silvercorp UC Resources Wildcat Silver ” border=”0″> –> Feature Story Feature Story Investment Rarities: Are Silver Prices Set to Skyrocket?
PRWeb
Feb 24, 2010
Home | Ranking | Editorials | News | Silver Story | Silver Use | Glossary | About | Contact | Disclaimer
Copyright ? 2004-2010 Silver Strategies, Inc. Best viewed in IE6. Designed by Mondrus CCS, Inc.
–>
partial keyword search is supported
Are the recent silver short contract buy-backs by COMEX commercial accounts a precursor to a significant increase in the price of silver? Yes, according to noted silver analyst, Theodore Butler, in an interview about to be published by Investment Rarities, Inc., a Minneapolis-based investment firm. Butler contends the actions will help clear the way for a significant price increase in silver “because the concentrated holdings of silver short contracts, held principally by commercial banks, has been artificially depressing the price of silver.” ” … this liquidation leaves the silver market in a much healthier position,” says IRI president, Jim Cook. “ Since January, the big COMEX commercial shorts, including J.P. Morgan, have bought 24,000 silver short contracts, the equivalent of 120 million ounces of the precious metal, according to the latest “Commitment of Traders Report” released by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). …
There’s a new competition underway in the gold community. The Gman worshippers and the toilet paper currency worshippers, having failed totally to make you any money in gold, or money in anything for that matter, have now decided to remake their own story of the 1929 boom and bust era, and use it to see if you’re ready, willing, and able to report to the Constitution with your chainsaw, to help them carve up what’s left of it. …
The views contained here are those of the author(s) and may not represent the views of SilverStrategies.com, its employees, affiliates or advertisers. SilverStrategies.com makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) available on this site. In no event shall SilverStrategies.com or its affiliates be liable to any person or entity for decisions made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.
Our staff of over 30 designers and jewelry professionals is dedicated to artistry, fine craftsmanship and innovation.
Design a Ring In 5 Easy Steps
good hands.
your choice of details
Green Lake Jewelry Works Simple - Artful - Fun!
Gems,Diamonds Buy It Now Other Jewelry Bands Mountings Home Custom Process Design Elements Design Page Artists Image Search “> Home
Testimonials
550 NE Northgate Way, Seattle WA 98125 P.206.527.1108 Toll Free P:1.888.339.1709 E-mail :
Login
Welcome to our new website. Please let us know how we can help.
specializing in unusual and unique engagement rings and Custom wedding bands.
At Green Lake Jewelry Works we make the finest quality custom jewelry,
Save Some Pictures & Ideas
or ready to finish with
Leave the rest to us!
This content requires the Macromedia Flash Player. DownLoad Flash Player
voting ends Feb 20!
Best of Seattle Bride 2010
Consult with a real Artist on
A combined 300+ years of creativity and experience is available to you in each new design.
(Usually in 2-3 weeks.)
Vote Here
( To Save Favorites & Notes)
Help | More
Easy Order Designs are
Browse Our Galleries.
100% complete
Instock Designs are either:
© 2005-2010 Green Lake Jewelry Works. All rights reserved.
The shop is not a back room, but is about one half of the floor space of the store.
We were so happy to find Green Lake Jewely Works.
After just a short time with Melissa, we knew that we were in
About
your Personal Design Page
-Misty & Andrew
The whole experience of designing our ring was wonderful. We feel that our love is very special and unique, as I’m sure a lot of couples do, and only a very unique ring would feel right. We love looking at our ring together. It’s perfect!"
Employment / Accessories / Determine Ring Size / Site Map / Privacy Policy / E-mail Us / Seattle Location / News About The Shop
Made to Order
Instock Designs & Easy Order Designs
American Favorites, Today’s Tastes Order Online
Blueplate Club
Gift Cards
Catering
Healthier Dining Options
Kids & Family
Community & Fundraising
About Silver Diner
Menus & Locations
Contact Us Find a Silver Diner Near You Enter your City and State, or Zip Code Footer Menu Join Our Team
Metro Silver Diner
Site Map
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy ©2010 Silver Diner, All Rights Reserved
Notes:
\n’; var printReadyElem = document.getElementById(”printReady”);
if (printReadyElem != null)
{
html += printReadyElem.innerHTML;
}
else
{
alert(”Could not find the printReady section in the HTML”);
return;
} html += ‘\n\n’; var printWin = window.open(”",”printSpecial”, ‘toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,copyhistory=yes,width=350,height=350′);
printWin.document.open();
printWin.document.write(html);
printWin.document.close();
if (gAutoPrint)
printWin.print();
}
else
{
alert(”Sorry, the print ready feature is only available in modern browsers.”);
}
}
Ag
Dana No: 01.01.01.02 Strunz No: 01.AA.05
Locality:
Silver